Simon looking earnest in Preveza, Greece
Simon Shields, Lawyer

Advising Self-Representing
Ontario Litigants
Since 2005

tenant / small claims / welfare (ontario works) / odsp / human rights / employment / consumer /
collection agencies / criminal injuries compensation / sppa (admin law)
/ line fences / animal cruelty / dogs & cats / wild animal law (all Canada) / war / conditions of guide use

home / about / client testimonials / areas of practice / about self-representation

Service Options

Simon Shields, LLB

Evidence - Privilege

Philip Services Corp. v. Deloitte & Touche (Ont CA, 2015)

In this case the Court of Appeal re-stated the long-respected test for determining privilege over information and documents, whereby such data is protected by principles of both confidentiality and evidentiary non-compellability. In Canadian law privilege is not established by the nature of the relationship in which the data was generated (eg. solicitor-client) but on a case-by-case basis:
[18] The four elements examined in analyzing a case-by-case privilege – the Wigmore criteria[1] – are as follows:
1. the communication must originate in a confidence that they will not be disclosed;

2. the confidentiality must be essential to the full and satisfactory maintenance of the relation between the parties;

3. the relation must be one which in the opinion of the community ought to be sedulously fostered; and

4. the injury that would inure to the relation by the disclosure of the communications must be greater than the benefit thereby gained for the correct disposal of litigation.

Lawyer License #37308N / Website © Simon Shields 2005-2017