Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)


Franchise - Evidence

. 2355305 Ontario Inc. v. Savannah Wells Holdings Inc.

In 2355305 Ontario Inc. v. Savannah Wells Holdings Inc. (Ont CA, 2025) the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed a franchisor's appeal, here from a successful "franchisee’s action brought under the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, S.O. 2000, c.3 (the “Act”) for damages".

Here the court notes the burden of proof for AWAFD exemptions:
[7] Pursuant to s. 12 of the Act, at trial, the onus was on the Franchisor to prove that the exemption applied.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 06-10-25
By: admin