Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


Police - Neglect of Duty

. Mohamud v. Law Enforcement Complaints Agency

In Mohamud v. Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (Ont Divisional Ct, 2024) the Divisional Court dismissed a JR, here against the decision of "the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD), which is now the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA)".

The court considered the test for police neglect of duty:
[45] The Director considered the correct legal test for assessing the offence of Neglect of Duty, as set out in Korchinski v. Office of the Independent Police Review Director, 2022 ONSC 6074 (Div. Ct.), at para 42. To establish Neglect of Duty the evidence must demonstrate the existence of three elements: (i) a duty existed; (ii) the officer failed to promptly and diligently discharge the relevant duty; and (iii) there is no lawful excuse, good or sufficient cause or adequate reason to excuse the failure to discharge the duty.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 07-01-25
By: admin