|
RHPA - Judicial Review (JR). Crosbie v. Health Professionals Appeal & Review Board
In Crosbie v. Health Professionals Appeal & Review Board (Ont Div Ct, 2026) the Ontario Divisional Court dismissed a JR, this brought against an HPARB ruling that "confirmed the ICRC decision and concluded that the College’s investigation was adequate and the ICRC decision was reasonable", this relating to a physicians' statutory duty regarding "mandatory reporting requirements under the Highway Traffic Act".
Here the court considers the review route from a RHPA HPPC s.35 finding:[7] There is no appeal from an HPARB decision under s. 35 [SS: 'Powers of Board'] of the Health Professions Procedural Code, Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O 1991, c. 18 upon HPARB’s review of an ICRC decision. The Divisional Court’s jurisdiction is limited to a judicial review application. . Chopra v. Ontario (Health Professions Appeal and Review Board)
In Chopra v. Ontario (Health Professions Appeal and Review Board) (Div Court, 2024) the Divisional Court dismissed an RHPA judicial review, here that "impose(d) an administrative disposition of a complaint":[2] There is no appeal from the impugned HPARB decision. This court has jurisdiction to judicially review the decision pursuant to s. 2(1) of the Judicial Review Procedure Act, RSO 1990, c. J.1; the standard of review is reasonableness: Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 SCR 653.
|
