Simon's Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)

Administrative - De Minimis

. Waterloo North Condominium Corporation No. 37 v. Baha

In Waterloo North Condominium Corporation No. 37 v. Baha (Ont Div Ct, 2025) the Ontario Divisional Court dismissed a condo's "appeal pursuant to s. 1.46 of the Condominium Act, which provides that a party to a proceeding before the CAT may appeal the order to the Divisional Court on a question of law", here requesting "to have a dog removed".

Here the court considered an amount of less than $100 to be de minimis:
Issue 4: Did the CAT err in law by granting Ms. Baha and Mr. Murphy an exception to the common expenses payable in relation to the costs incurred in the underlying application?

[52] Having been advised that the common expense credit the CAT granted Ms. Baha and Mr. Murphy amounted to less than $100, the de minimis rule applies which means that it can be disregarded because of its insignificance.

CC0

Unless authorship is otherwise stated or obvious from the context, all
written materials in this website were created by Simon Shields, who
waives all of his copyright and related or neighboring rights to this
Isthatlegal.ca webpage. Note in particular that this waiver only applies to
Simon's material, as copyright in statutory/regulatory materials and
case extracts were never his to give away.




Last modified: 18-06-25
By: admin