In Bowen v. JC Clark Ltd. (Ont CA, 2022) the Court of Appeal considered a contractual term that made consideration of a bonus discretionary to the employer:
(i) Entitlement to the discretionary bonus under paragraph 5
[35] I do not accept the respondent’s position that the discretionary nature of the bonus provision in paragraph 5 of the employment agreements means that the employer was entirely unconstrained as to how that discretion was exercised. Where an employment agreement provides for a discretionary bonus, there is an implied term that the discretion will be exercised in a fair and reasonable manner: see Bain v. UBS, 2016 ONSC 5362, at paras. 85-90, aff’d 2018 ONCA 190, 46 C.C.E.L. (4th) 50; Greenberg v. Meffert (1985), 1985 CanLII 1975 (ON CA), 18 D.L.R. (4th) 548 (Ont. C.A.), at pp. 555-56, leave to appeal refused, [1985] 2 S.C.R. ix; and Chann v. RBC Dominion Securities Inc. (2004), 2004 CanLII 66310 (ON SC), 34 C.C.E.L. (3d) 244 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 48.
The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.
