In Steubing v. Drewlo Holdings Inc. (Ont Div Ct, 2025) the Ontario Divisional Court dismissed a tenant's RTA s.210 appeal, here from "a Motion to Set Aside Order ... [which] terminated the tenancy ..." and the subsequent dismissed LTB review.
This is an RTA s.78(11) non-payment case [See 'Enforceable-Order-to-Eviction "Catch-Up Payment" and Tenant's One-Time Motion to Set Aside Eviction Order' - http://www.isthatlegal.ca/index.php?name=termination_non-payment.tenant_law_ontario#Enforceable-Order-to-Eviction%20Catch-Up%20Payment%20and%20Tenant's%20One-Time%20Motion%20to%20Set%20Aside%20Eviction%20Order].
Here the court considered the LTB Practice Direction respecting 'support persons' ['Practice Direction on Representation before the Landlord and Tenant Board']:
[32] The LTB’s Practice Direction on Representation before the Landlord and Tenant Board makes provision for a support person that distinguishes this role from representatives or witnesses as follows:
Support Persons
A support person, such as a family member, friend or social worker, may attend a hearing or mediation with a party or witness to sit with and assist the person participating in the proceeding. Such a support person is not considered a representative, so long as they do not make submissions on the party's behalf. If a party wants their support person to testify at the hearing, they should inform the LTB at the beginning of the hearing. If a support person is testifying, they may be considered a witness and may be excluded from the hearing until they testify.
The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.