Simon's Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)

Criminal - Sexual Offences - Mens Rea

. R. v. J.O.P.

In R. v. J.O.P. (Ont CA, 2025) the Ontario Court of Appeal considered the subjective mens rea for sexual offences:
The trial judge did not err by applying an objective test to find that the appellant had the requisite mens rea for sexual assault

[27] To prove the mens rea required for sexual assault, the Crown had to show that the appellant intended to touch the complainant, and that he knew that she did not consent, or was reckless or wilfully blind to her lack of consent: R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 579, at paras. 87-90. Like knowledge, recklessness and wilful blindness are subjective standards that require examining “what the accused subjectively knew or understood at the time of the sexual activity”: R. v. A.B., 2024 ONCA 446, 173 O.R. (3d) 104, at para. 35. ....

CC0

Unless authorship is otherwise stated or obvious from the context, all
written materials in this website were created by Simon Shields, who
waives all of his copyright and related or neighboring rights to this
Isthatlegal.ca webpage. Note in particular that this waiver only applies to
Simon's material, as copyright in statutory/regulatory materials and
case extracts were never his to give away.




Last modified: 24-02-25
By: admin