Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

home / about / Democracy, Law and Duty / testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS


Juries (Civil) - Liability Apportionment

. El Ghafari v Treehuba

In El Ghafari v Treehuba (Ont CA, 2015) a civil jury apportioned liability 90% to 10% between parties. On a motion to set aside this allocation the Court of Appeal stated the standard for so doing as follows:
[1] The appellant asks the Court to set aside the jury verdict apportioning liability 90% to the appellant and 10% to the respondent. The test for setting aside a jury verdict is very rigorous; see F.C. (Guardian of) v. 511825 Ontario Inc., 171 O.A.C. 119, 2003 CanLII 9990 (ON CA) at para. 44, where Cronk J.A. states:
The verdict of a jury in a civil case will not be set aside as against the weight of evidence unless it is so plainly unreasonable and unjust as to satisfy the appellant court that no jury, reviewing the evidence as a whole and acting judicially, could have reached it.



CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 07-11-22
By: admin