Simon looking earnest in Preveza, Greece
Simon Shields, Lawyer

Advising Self-Representing
Ontario Litigants
Since 2005

tenant / small claims / welfare (ontario works) / odsp / human rights / employment / consumer /
collection agencies / criminal injuries compensation / sppa (admin law)
/ line fences / animal cruelty / dogs & cats / wild animal law (all Canada) / war / conditions of guide use

home / about / client testimonials / areas of practice / about self-representation

Your
Self-Representation
Service Options

Simon Shields, LLB




























Mootness - Discretion to Hear Appeal Despite

Slate Management Corporation v. Canada (Attorney General) (Ont CA, 2017)

In this case the Court of Appeal briefly sets out the factors to be considered by a court when considering to hear a matter despite it being moot:
[28] Once a court determines that an appeal is moot, it is necessary to decide whether the court should nonetheless exercise its discretion to hear the case: Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), 1989 CanLII 123 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 342, at p. 353. Three factors are relevant in determining whether a court should entertain a moot appeal: (i) the presence of an adversarial context that will ensure that the issues are well and fully argued; (ii) concern for judicial economy; and (iii) awareness of the court’s proper law-making function: Borowski, pp. 358-363.

Lawyer License #37308N / Website © Simon Shields 2005-2017