Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


JR - Evidence - Keeprite Current (3)

. Leitch v. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

In Leitch v. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (Ont Divisional Ct, 2024) the Ontario Court of Appeal considered the Keeprite record doctrine:
[10] A party can supplement the record on a judicial review if the new evidence is necessary to show an absence of evidence on an essential point, or to establish a breach of natural justice that is not evident from the record of the proceedings below: Keeprite Workers’ Independent Union v. Keeprite Products Ltd. (1980), 1980 CanLII 1877 (ON CA), 29 O.R. (2d) 513 (Ont. C.A.). Ms. Leitch argues the affidavits and recording are admissible because they show she was denied procedural fairness at the hearing before Vice-Chair Dawson.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 23-12-24
By: admin