Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


Appeals - Quashing (2)

. Ontario Place for All Inc. v. Ontario (Ministry of Infrastructure)

In Ontario Place for All Inc. v. Ontario (Ministry of Infrastructure) (Div Court, 2024) a single judge of the Divisional Court considered a JR by a citizen's group of the province's "decision not to include the redevelopment of Ontario Place’s West Island in the Category C Public Work Class Environmental Assessment of the Ontario Place Redevelopment Project pursuant to the Environmental Assessment Act".

Here the court dismissed a motion to quash the JR:
Test on a Motion to Quash

[20] The test on a motion to quash an application for judicial review is whether it is “plain and obvious” or “beyond doubt” that the application cannot succeed: Ye v. Toronto District School Board, 2023 ONSC 2918 at para.18.

[21] Alternatively, to the extent that there is no longer a tangible and concrete dispute between the parties, a single judge can quash an application on the basis of mootness.



CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 29-03-24
By: admin