Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


Competition - Appeals

. Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Rogers Communications Inc. [appeals]

In Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Rogers Communications Inc. (Fed CA, 2023) the Federal Court of Appeal considered a Commissioner of Competition s.13 appeal against a corporate telecommunications merger:
[3] To make an order blocking the overall transaction, the Tribunal would have had to find that it would be likely to prevent or lessen competition substantially: section 92 of the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34.

....

[5] On appeal, we are to treat the order of the Competition Tribunal "“as if it were a judgment of the Federal Court”": Competition Tribunal Act, s. 13(1).

[6] This means that we can reverse the Competition Tribunal where it has erred on:
. legal points, including legal points that dominate the answer to a question of mixed fact and law, or

. factually suffused questions of mixed fact and law,

and the error(s) could have affected the result.
....

[8] Section 13 of the Competition Tribunal Act does not allow appeals on pure questions of fact where, as here, leave has not been sought.
The case is brief for such a high-media case, but useful to understand anti-competitive merger law.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 17-10-24
By: admin