Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


Judges - Competence

. Hall v. Unifund Assurance Company

In Hall v. Unifund Assurance Company (Div Court, 2024) the Ontario Divisional Court considers a direct challenge to the competency of the tribunal member:
[23] Finally, the appellant submits that, as a recent appointee to the Licence Appeal Tribunal, the Adjudicator did not possess the necessary qualities of experience and expertise to attract the deference described by the Court of Appeal in Pastore v Aviva Canada Inc., 2012 ONCA 642 at paras. 19 and 22. That is an untenable and inappropriate submission. As with any judicial officer or tribunal member, the Adjudicator is presumed to have the necessary qualities and competencies to execute his functions. Deference is not dependant upon an assessment of a decision-maker’s background knowledge or experience let alone a gratuitous and unsubstantiated allegation in a factum.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 02-12-24
By: admin