Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

home / about / Democracy, Law and Duty / testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS


Medical - Canada Health Act

. Physicians’ Dialysis Center Inc. v. Credit Valley Hospital

In Physicians’ Dialysis Center Inc. v. Credit Valley Hospital (Ont CA, 2023) the Court of Appeal, in characterizing a party's position on appeal, locates the Canadian and Ontario statutory basis of the prohibition on medical 'extra billing' by physicians:
[44] In the alternative, the appellants submit that the trial judge’s interpretation of the MOU results in an illegal agreement, because it would entail payment for “extra billing” for an insured health service rendered to an insured person, which is proscribed by the Canada Health Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-6 at ss. 18-21; see also Ontario’s Commitment to the Future of Medicare Act, 2004, S.O. 2004, c. 5, at s. 10.




CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 07-06-23
By: admin